![]() it looks a little OR very green in a light environment or in dark environment.It is not a write-balance problem. But i think i must do it.Because ASP2 can not support Nikon D3300 NEF file. Yes.As your words,no significant benefits. No significant benefits, just the big drawback of being married to Adobe for the rest of your life. ![]() I do use both Lightroom and Photoshop myself, and haven't converted a single file. I really can't see any benefits of the converted DNG format for any reason. I think we all agree that there's many other things we need Corel to focus their resources on before demanding them to profile each camera once more.Ĭonverting to Adobe DNG is one thing, but what's the thought behind deleting all the originals.?Īdobe can and will continue to open all kinds of RAW files long into the next millennium, so from this viewpoint there's no need to convert, even if you want to continue using Adobe's products. ![]() Adobe converted DNG is no longer a RAW file and is just the name of a container that by coincidence is identical to the camera file name.īy earlier explanations from Afx, Corel has to profile each camera twice if converted Adobe DNG is to be supported. It future proofs Aftershot as well since it will support files from future cameras (even if they did not release a version that can manage) as long as it's a DNG.Īrnfinn wrote:Camera generated DNG is RAW. If you want the product to reach some critical mass in terms of users I feel that this is a must - and there is no real barrier here, I'm willing to throw my old settings away, but I still must be able to read files imported using "Adobe DNG converter".ĭespite searching the web, I was unable to find a satisfying explanation as to why the core DNG format is unsupported. You are effectively telling users "we don't want you" - that's not only a bad business practice, but also alienates users from ever trying Aftershot again in the future. (and if not, then Aftershot can bring up a popup message explaining that) - but between that and completely ignoring DNG files, there's a huge that just makes it worthless for many existing user to migrate to Aftershot. I understand that Aftershot cannot support converting/applying most of Adobe's internally defined metadata (exposure, contrast, highlights, shadows, radial and linear gradient filters, selective brush and more) - but reading the RAW file as a plain old RAW without applying any of Adobe's metadata is still good enough, the reason is that I'm going to use Aftershot forward, on new files and rarely use it to examine old files (and if I do, I'd just have to re-edit them using Aftershot). I downloaded the trial and I found out that my tens of thousands of RAW files are unreadable by it. I always convert my RAW files to DNG when importing them into my computer and I've historically been a lightroom user.Īfter reading an article about aftershot, I decided to give it a try. It also unifies the format no matter what cameras I use (Nikon, Pentax, Canon, Sony) so I don't have mixed files I need to support (install various plugins to support preview in Windows Explorer, for example). DNG saves me about 25% of disk storage, which translates to a lot of money when you shoot as much as I do. I shoot using a Nikon D800 and my 14bit NEF files are usually around 50MB in size each.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |